Is there a zip-like function that pads to longest length?

Question

Is there a built-in function that works like zip() but that will pad the results so that the length of the resultant list is the length of the longest input rather than the shortest input?

>>> a = ['a1']
>>> b = ['b1', 'b2', 'b3']
>>> c = ['c1', 'c2']

>>> zip(a, b, c)
[('a1', 'b1', 'c1')]

>>> What command goes here?
[('a1', 'b1', 'c1'), (None, 'b2', 'c2'), (None, 'b3', None)]

Asked By: Mark Harrison

||

Source

Answer 1

For Python 2.6x use itertools module’s izip_longest.

For Python 3 use zip_longest instead (no leading i).

>>> list(itertools.izip_longest(a, b, c))
[('a1', 'b1', 'c1'), (None, 'b2', 'c2'), (None, 'b3', None)]

Answered By: SilentGhost

Answer 2

In Python 3 you can use itertools.zip_longest

>>> list(itertools.zip_longest(a, b, c))
[('a1', 'b1', 'c1'), (None, 'b2', 'c2'), (None, 'b3', None)]

You can pad with a different value than None by using the fillvalue parameter:

>>> list(itertools.zip_longest(a, b, c, fillvalue='foo'))
[('a1', 'b1', 'c1'), ('foo', 'b2', 'c2'), ('foo', 'b3', 'foo')]

With Python 2 you can either use itertools.izip_longest (Python 2.6+), or you can use map with None. It is a little known feature of map (but map changed in Python 3.x, so this only works in Python 2.x).

>>> map(None, a, b, c)
[('a1', 'b1', 'c1'), (None, 'b2', 'c2'), (None, 'b3', None)]

Answered By: Nadia Alramli

Answer 3

non itertools Python 3 solution:

def zip_longest(*lists):
    def g(l):
        for item in l:
            yield item
        while True:
            yield None
    gens = [g(l) for l in lists]    
    for _ in range(max(map(len, lists))):
        yield tuple(next(g) for g in gens)

Answered By: dansalmo

Answer 4

non itertools My Python 2 solution:

if len(list1) < len(list2):
    list1.extend([None] * (len(list2) - len(list1)))
else:
    list2.extend([None] * (len(list1) - len(list2)))

Answered By: Helton Wernik

Answer 5

Im using a 2d array but the concept is the similar using python 2.x:

if len(set([len(p) for p in printer])) > 1:
    printer = [column+['']*(max([len(p) for p in printer])-len(column)) for column in printer]

Answered By: user12204058

Answer 6

In addition to the accepted answer, if you’re working with iterables that might be different lengths but shouldn’t be, it’s recommended to pass strict=True to zip() (supported since Python 3.10).

To quote the documentation:

zip() is often used in cases where the iterables are assumed to be of
equal length. In such cases, it’s recommended to use the strict=True
option. Its output is the same as regular zip():
>>> list(zip(('a', 'b', 'c'), (1, 2, 3), strict=True))
[('a', 1), ('b', 2), ('c', 3)]
Unlike the default behavior, it checks that the
lengths of iterables are identical, raising a ValueError if they
aren’t:
>>> list(zip(range(3), ['fee', 'fi', 'fo', 'fum'], strict=True))
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ValueError: zip() argument 2 is longer than argument 1
Without the strict=True argument, any bug
that results in iterables of different lengths will be silenced,
possibly manifesting as a hard-to-find bug in another part of the
program.

Answered By: Eugene Yarmash

Answer 7

To add to the answers already given, the following works for any iterable and does not use itertools, answering @ProdIssue’s question:

def zip_longest(*iterables, default_value):
    iterators = tuple(iter(i) for i in iterables)
    sentinel = object()
    while True:
        new = tuple(next(i, sentinel) for i in iterators)
        if all(n is sentinel for n in new):
            return
        yield tuple(default_value if n is sentinel else n for n in new)

The use of sentinel is needed so an iterator yielding default_value will not be erroneously be identified as empty.

Answered By: Jonathan

Answer 8

Just use iterators, nothing fancy.

def zip_longest(*iterables):
    items = 0
    for iterable in iterables:
        items = max(items, len(iterable))

    iters = [iter(iterable) for iterable in iterables]
    while items:
        yield (*[next(i, None) for i in iters],)
        items -= 1

Answered By: Iurii Vasylenko

Is there a zip-like function that pads to longest length?

Question:

Answers: