Python – import in if

Question

I wrote little wrapper for urllib (python3). Is it proper and safe to import module in if?

if self.response_encoding == 'gzip':
    import gzip

I didn’t find any PEP about this code. However, it bothers me.

Asked By: Mateusz Jagiełło

||

Source

Answer 1

Sure, that’s fine. It can even be necessary in cases where the module has initialization code that you don’t always want to run.

Answered By: John Kugelman

Answer 2

This is a reasonably common idiom actually. You’ll sometimes see it to pick between different modules:

if system == 'linux':
   import linuxdeps as deps
elif system == 'win32':
   import win32deps as deps

Then, assuming both linuxdeps and win32deps have the same functions, you can just use it:

deps.func()

This is even used to get os.path in the standard library (some of the source code for os follows):

if 'posix' in _names:
    name = 'posix'
    linesep = 'n'
    from posix import *
    try:
        from posix import _exit
    except ImportError:
        pass
    import posixpath as path

    import posix
    __all__.extend(_get_exports_list(posix))
    del posix

elif 'nt' in _names:
    name = 'nt'
    linesep = 'rn'
    from nt import *
    try:
        from nt import _exit
    except ImportError:
        pass
    import ntpath as path

    import nt
    __all__.extend(_get_exports_list(nt))
    del nt

Answered By: mgilson

Answer 3

The Python standard library uses it, so it is most definitely proper and safe. See the os module source for an excellent example:

if 'posix' in _names:
    name = 'posix'
    linesep = 'n'
    from posix import *
    try:
        from posix import _exit
    except ImportError:
      pass
    import posixpath as path
    import posix
    __all__.extend(_get_exports_list(posix))
    del posix

It’s quite common to conditionally import modules in python. Instead of if, you’ll often see a try:/except ImportError: combination too:

try:
    from subprocess import check_output
except ImportError:
    # Python 2.6 and before
    def check_output(*popenargs, **kwargs):
        from subprocess import Popen
        if 'stdout' in kwargs:
            raise ValueError('stdout argument not allowed, it will be '
                             'overridden.')
        process = Popen(stdout=PIPE, *popenargs, **kwargs)
        output, unused_err = process.communicate()
        retcode = process.poll()
        if retcode:
            cmd = kwargs.get("args")
            if cmd is None:
                cmd = popenargs[0]
            raise CalledProcessError(retcode, cmd)
        return output

Here, we basically use the moral equivalent of an if test: If you can import check_output, do so, otherwise define the full function here.

An import statement is just a re-binding of an external piece of code to a local name. Using an if control flow to control the import is no different from assigning a variable in an if statement in that regard. You need to make sure you don’t end up using the name without it being defined either way.

Answered By: Martijn Pieters

Answer 4

Is it safe? Yes. As Martijin’s answer pointed out that Official Python use this.

Is it proper? Depends. Python performance docs points out that even though python can avoid import the same module, there is still overhead.

So i believe you should ask yourself, how often the if statement is true. If very often, then there will be large overhead, and you should import it at the beginning of the file. If not often, then import in if statement is a wise choice.

Answered By: user3483404

Python – import in if

Question:

Answers: