When should Flask.g be used?

Question

I saw that g will move from the request context to the app context in Flask 0.10, which made me confused about the intended use of g.

My understanding (for Flask 0.9) is that:

g lives in the request context, i.e., created afresh when the requests starts, and available until it ends
g is intended to be used as a “request blackboard”, where I can put stuff relevant for the duration of the request (i.e., set a flag at the beginning of the request and handle it at the end, possibly from a before_request/after_request pair)
in addition to holding request-level-state, g can and should be used for resource management, i.e., holding database connections, etc.

Which of these sentences are no longer true in Flask 0.10? Can someone point me to a resource discussing the reasons for the change? What should I use as a “request blackboard” in Flask 0.10 – should I create my own app/extension specific thread-local proxy and push it to the context stack before_request? What’s the point of resource management at the application context, if my application lives for a long while (not like a request) and thus the resources are never freed?

Asked By: Yaniv Aknin

||

Source

Answer 1

Advanced Flask Patterns, as linked by Markus, explains some of the changes to g in 0.10:

g now lives in the application context.
Every request pushes a new application context, wiping the old one, so g can still be used to set flags per-request without change to code.
The application context is popped after teardown_request is called. (Armin’s presentation explains this is because things like creating DB connections are tasks which setup the environment for the request, and should not be handled inside before_request and after_request)

Answered By: theY4Kman

Answer 2

As an addendum to the information in this thread: I’ve been a bit confused by the behavior of flask.g too, but some quick testing has helped me to clarify it. Here’s what I tried out:

from flask import Flask, g
app = Flask(__name__)

with app.app_context():
    print('in app context, before first request context')
    print('setting g.foo to abc')
    g.foo = 'abc'
    print('g.foo should be abc, is: {0}'.format(g.foo))

    with app.test_request_context():
        print('in first request context')
        print('g.foo should be abc, is: {0}'.format(g.foo))
        print('setting g.foo to xyz')
        g.foo = 'xyz'
        print('g.foo should be xyz, is: {0}'.format(g.foo))

    print('in app context, after first request context')
    print('g.foo should be abc, is: {0}'.format(g.foo))

    with app.test_request_context():
        print('in second request context')
        print('g.foo should be abc, is: {0}'.format(g.foo))
        print('setting g.foo to pqr')
        g.foo = 'pqr'
        print('g.foo should be pqr, is: {0}'.format(g.foo))

    print('in app context, after second request context')
    print('g.foo should be abc, is: {0}'.format(g.foo))

And here’s the output that it gives:

in app context, before first request context
setting g.foo to abc
g.foo should be abc, is: abc  

in first request context
g.foo should be abc, is: abc
setting g.foo to xyz
g.foo should be xyz, is: xyz  

in app context, after first request context
g.foo should be abc, is: xyz  

in second request context
g.foo should be abc, is: xyz
setting g.foo to pqr
g.foo should be pqr, is: pqr  

in app context, after second request context
g.foo should be abc, is: pqr

As theY4Kman said above, “Every request pushes a new application context”. And as the Flask docs say, the application context “will not be shared between requests”. Now, what hasn’t been explicitly stated (although I guess it’s implied from these statements), and what my testing clearly shows, is that you should never explicitly create multiple request contexts nested inside one application context, because flask.g (and co) doesn’t have any magic whereby it functions in the two different “levels” of context, with different states existing independently at the application and request levels.

The reality is that “application context” is potentially quite a misleading name, because app.app_context() is a per-request context, exactly the same as the “request context”. Think of it as a “request context lite”, only required in the case where you need some of the variables that normally require a request context, but you don’t need access to any request object (e.g. when running batch DB operations in a shell script). If you try and extend the application context to encompass more than one request context, you’re asking for trouble. So, rather than my test above, you should instead write code like this with Flask’s contexts:

from flask import Flask, g
app = Flask(__name__)

with app.app_context():
    print('in app context, before first request context')
    print('setting g.foo to abc')
    g.foo = 'abc'
    print('g.foo should be abc, is: {0}'.format(g.foo))

with app.test_request_context():
    print('in first request context')
    print('g.foo should be None, is: {0}'.format(g.get('foo')))
    print('setting g.foo to xyz')
    g.foo = 'xyz'
    print('g.foo should be xyz, is: {0}'.format(g.foo))

with app.test_request_context():
    print('in second request context')
    print('g.foo should be None, is: {0}'.format(g.get('foo')))
    print('setting g.foo to pqr')
    g.foo = 'pqr'
    print('g.foo should be pqr, is: {0}'.format(g.foo))

Which will give the expected results:

in app context, before first request context
setting g.foo to abc
g.foo should be abc, is: abc  

in first request context
g.foo should be None, is: None
setting g.foo to xyz
g.foo should be xyz, is: xyz  

in second request context
g.foo should be None, is: None
setting g.foo to pqr
g.foo should be pqr, is: pqr

Answered By: Jaza

When should Flask.g be used?

Question:

Answers: