"Cloning" row or column vectors

First note that with numpy’s broadcasting operations it’s usually not necessary to duplicate rows and columns. See this and this for descriptions.

But to do this, repeat and newaxis are probably the best way

In [12]: x = array([1,2,3])

In [13]: repeat(x[:,newaxis], 3, 1)
Out[13]: 
array([[1, 1, 1],
       [2, 2, 2],
       [3, 3, 3]])

In [14]: repeat(x[newaxis,:], 3, 0)
Out[14]: 
array([[1, 2, 3],
       [1, 2, 3],
       [1, 2, 3]])

This example is for a row vector, but applying this to a column vector is hopefully obvious. repeat seems to spell this well, but you can also do it via multiplication as in your example

In [15]: x = array([[1, 2, 3]])  # note the double brackets

In [16]: (ones((3,1))*x).transpose()
Out[16]: 
array([[ 1.,  1.,  1.],
       [ 2.,  2.,  2.],
       [ 3.,  3.,  3.]])

Use numpy.tile:

>>> tile(array([1,2,3]), (3, 1))
array([[1, 2, 3],
       [1, 2, 3],
       [1, 2, 3]])

or for repeating columns:

>>> tile(array([[1,2,3]]).transpose(), (1, 3))
array([[1, 1, 1],
       [2, 2, 2],
       [3, 3, 3]])

I think using the broadcast in numpy is the best, and faster

I did a compare as following

import numpy as np
b = np.random.randn(1000)
In [105]: %timeit c = np.tile(b[:, newaxis], (1,100))
1000 loops, best of 3: 354 µs per loop

In [106]: %timeit c = np.repeat(b[:, newaxis], 100, axis=1)
1000 loops, best of 3: 347 µs per loop

In [107]: %timeit c = np.array([b,]*100).transpose()
100 loops, best of 3: 5.56 ms per loop

about 15 times faster using broadcast

You can use

np.tile(x,3).reshape((4,3))

tile will generate the reps of the vector

and reshape will give it the shape you want

Let:

>>> n = 1000
>>> x = np.arange(n)
>>> reps = 10000

Zero-cost allocations

A view does not take any additional memory. Thus, these declarations are instantaneous:

# New axis
x[np.newaxis, ...]

# Broadcast to specific shape
np.broadcast_to(x, (reps, n))

Forced allocation

If you want force the contents to reside in memory:

>>> %timeit np.array(np.broadcast_to(x, (reps, n)))
10.2 ms ± 62.3 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

>>> %timeit np.repeat(x[np.newaxis, :], reps, axis=0)
9.88 ms ± 52.4 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

>>> %timeit np.tile(x, (reps, 1))
9.97 ms ± 77.3 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

All three methods are roughly the same speed.

Computation

>>> a = np.arange(reps * n).reshape(reps, n)
>>> x_tiled = np.tile(x, (reps, 1))

>>> %timeit np.broadcast_to(x, (reps, n)) * a
17.1 ms ± 284 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

>>> %timeit x[np.newaxis, :] * a
17.5 ms ± 300 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

>>> %timeit x_tiled * a
17.6 ms ± 240 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

All three methods are roughly the same speed.

Conclusion

If you want to replicate before a computation, consider using one of the “zero-cost allocation” methods. You won’t suffer the performance penalty of “forced allocation”.

import numpy as np
x=np.array([1,2,3])
y=np.multiply(np.ones((len(x),len(x))),x).T
print(y)

yields:

[[ 1.  1.  1.]
 [ 2.  2.  2.]
 [ 3.  3.  3.]]

One clean solution is to use NumPy’s outer-product function with a vector of ones:

np.outer(np.ones(n), x)

gives n repeating rows. Switch the argument order to get repeating columns. To get an equal number of rows and columns you might do

np.outer(np.ones_like(x), x)

If you have a pandas dataframe and want to preserve the dtypes, even the categoricals, this is a fast way to do it:

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({1: [1, 2, 3], 2: [4, 5, 6]})
number_repeats = 50
new_df = df.reindex(np.tile(df.index, number_repeats))

To answer the actual question, now that nearly a dozen approaches to working around a solution have been posted: x.transpose reverses the shape of x. One of the interesting side-effects is that if x.ndim == 1, the transpose does nothing.

This is especially confusing for people coming from MATLAB, where all arrays implicitly have at least two dimensions. The correct way to transpose a 1D numpy array is not x.transpose() or x.T, but rather

x[:, None]

or

x.reshape(-1, 1)

From here, you can multiply by a matrix of ones, or use any of the other suggested approaches, as long as you respect the (subtle) differences between MATLAB and numpy.

Returning to the original question

In MATLAB or octave this is done pretty easily:

x = [1, 2, 3]

a = ones(3, 1) * x
…

In numpy it’s pretty much the same (and easy to memorize too):

x = [1, 2, 3]
a = np.tile(x, (3, 1))

Another solution

>> x = np.array([1,2,3])
>> y = x[None, :] * np.ones((3,))[:, None]
>> y
array([[ 1.,  2.,  3.],
       [ 1.,  2.,  3.],
       [ 1.,  2.,  3.]])

Why? Sure, repeat and tile are the correct way to do this. But None indexing is a powerful tool that has many times let me quickly vectorize an operation (though it can quickly be very memory expensive!).

An example from my own code:

# trajectory is a sequence of xy coordinates [n_points, 2]
# xy_obstacles is a list of obstacles' xy coordinates [n_obstacles, 2]
# to compute dx, dy distance between every obstacle and every pose in the trajectory
deltas = trajectory[:, None, :2] - xy_obstacles[None, :, :2]
# we can easily convert x-y distance to a norm
distances = np.linalg.norm(deltas, axis=-1)
# distances is now [timesteps, obstacles]. Now we can for example find the closest obstacle at every point in the trajectory by doing
closest_obstacles = np.argmin(distances, axis=1)
# we could also find how safe the trajectory is, by finding the smallest distance over the entire trajectory
danger = np.min(distances)