Concatenation of inner lists or ints

Question:

I feel like I’m missing something obvious, but there it is… I would like to go from:

lst = [[0, 1, 3, 7, 8, 11, 12], [8, 0, 1, 2, 3, 14], 2]

to:

output = [0, 1, 3, 7, 8, 11, 12, 8, 0, 1, 2, 3, 14, 2]

I can do this with a for loop such as:

output = []
for l in lst:
    if hasattr(l, '__iter__'):
        output.extend(l)
    else:
        output.append(l)

Maybe the for-loop is fine, but it feels like there should be a more elegant way to do this… Trying to do this with numpy seems even more convoluted because ragged arrays aren’t easily handled… so you can’t (for example):

output = np.asanyarray(lst).flatten().tolist()

Thanks in advance.

Update:

Here’s my comparison between the two methods provided by @T.J and @Ashwini – thanks to both!

In [5]: %paste
from itertools import chain
from collections import Iterable
lis = [[0, 1, 3, 7, 8, 11, 12], [8, 0, 1, 2, 3, 14], 2]
def solve(lis):
    for x in lis:
        if isinstance(x, Iterable) and not isinstance(x, basestring):
            yield x
        else:
            yield [x]

%timeit list(chain.from_iterable(solve(lis)))

%timeit [a for x in lis for a in (x if isinstance(x, Iterable) and not isinstance(x,basestring) else [x])]
## -- End pasted text --
100000 loops, best of 3: 10.1 us per loop
100000 loops, best of 3: 8.12 us per loop

Update2:

...
lis = lis *10**5
%timeit list(chain.from_iterable(solve(lis)))

%timeit [a for x in lis for a in (x if isinstance(x, Iterable) and not isinstance(x,basestring) else [x])]
## -- End pasted text --
1 loops, best of 3: 699 ms per loop
1 loops, best of 3: 698 ms per loop
Asked By: blazetopher

||

Answers:

You can use itertools.chain like this:

>>> from itertools import chain
>>> from collections import Iterable
>>> lis = [[0, 1, 3, 7, 8, 11, 12], [8, 0, 1, 2, 3, 14], 2]
def solve(lis):
    for x in lis:
        if isinstance(x, Iterable) and not isinstance(x, basestring):
            yield x
        else:
            yield [x]
...             

>>> list(chain.from_iterable(solve(lis)))
[0, 1, 3, 7, 8, 11, 12, 8, 0, 1, 2, 3, 14, 2]

Works fine for strings too:

>>> lis = [[0, 1, 3, 7, 8, 11, 12], [8, 0, 1, 2, 3, 14], "234"]
>>> list(chain.from_iterable(solve(lis)))
[0, 1, 3, 7, 8, 11, 12, 8, 0, 1, 2, 3, 14, '234']

Timing comparisons:

>>> lis = lis *(10**4)
#modified version of FJ's answer that works for strings as well
>>> %timeit [a for x in lis for a in (x if isinstance(x, Iterable) and not isinstance(x,basestring) else [x])]
10 loops, best of 3: 110 ms per loop

>>> %timeit list(chain.from_iterable(solve(lis)))
1 loops, best of 3: 98.3 ms per loop
Answered By: Ashwini Chaudhary

You can Use generator to make list consist of iterables only

((i if isinstance(i,Iterable) else [i]) 

And then use any of following methods to concatenate them into one list:

would You try sum

from collections import Iterable
lis = [[0, 1, 3, 7, 8, 11, 12], [8, 0, 1, 2, 3, 14], 2]
sum(((i if isinstance(i,Iterable) else [i]) for i in lis), [])

You should provide initial value for sum [] to start sum from

or itertools.chain()
but in this case You should unpack Your upper-level list into set of lists

import itertools
lis = [[0, 1, 3, 7, 8, 11, 12], [8, 0, 1, 2, 3, 14], 2]
list(itertools.chain(*((i if isinstance(i,Iterable) else [i]) for i in lis)))

or just list comprehension

[a for x in input for a in (x if isinstance(x, Iterable) else [x])]

But One should mind that strings are iterable as well. And If there will be string on upper level it would be spited into chars.

Answered By: oleg

Here is a pretty straightforward approach that uses a list comprehension:

>>> data = [[0, 1, 3, 7, 8, 11, 12], [8, 0, 1, 2, 3, 14], 2]
>>> [a for x in data for a in (x if isinstance(x, list) else [x])]
[0, 1, 3, 7, 8, 11, 12, 8, 0, 1, 2, 3, 14, 2]

Here are timing comparisons, it looks like my version is slightly faster (note that I modified my code to use collections.Iterable as well to make sure the comparison is fair):

In [9]: %timeit list(chain.from_iterable(solve(data)))
100000 loops, best of 3: 9.22 us per loop

In [10]: %timeit [a for x in data for a in (x if isinstance(x, Iterable) else [x])]
100000 loops, best of 3: 6.45 us per loop
Answered By: Andrew Clark