Python Socket Receive Large Amount of Data

You may need to call conn.recv() multiple times to receive all the data. Calling it a single time is not guaranteed to bring in all the data that was sent, due to the fact that TCP streams don’t maintain frame boundaries (i.e. they only work as a stream of raw bytes, not a structured stream of messages).

See this answer for another description of the issue.

Note that this means you need some way of knowing when you have received all of the data. If the sender will always send exactly 8000 bytes, you could count the number of bytes you have received so far and subtract that from 8000 to know how many are left to receive; if the data is variable-sized, there are various other methods that can be used, such as having the sender send a number-of-bytes header before sending the message, or if it’s ASCII text that is being sent you could look for a newline or NUL character.

You can use it as: data = recvall(sock)

def recvall(sock):
    BUFF_SIZE = 4096 # 4 KiB
    data = b''
    while True:
        part = sock.recv(BUFF_SIZE)
        data += part
        if len(part) < BUFF_SIZE:
            # either 0 or end of data
            break
    return data

Modifying Adam Rosenfield’s code:

import sys


def send_msg(sock, msg):
    size_of_package = sys.getsizeof(msg)
    package = str(size_of_package)+":"+ msg #Create our package size,":",message
    sock.sendall(package)

def recv_msg(sock):
    try:
        header = sock.recv(2)#Magic, small number to begin with.
        while ":" not in header:
            header += sock.recv(2) #Keep looping, picking up two bytes each time

        size_of_package, separator, message_fragment = header.partition(":")
        message = sock.recv(int(size_of_package))
        full_message = message_fragment + message
        return full_message

    except OverflowError:
        return "OverflowError."
    except:
        print "Unexpected error:", sys.exc_info()[0]
        raise

I would, however, heavily encourage using the original approach.

A variation using a generator function (which I consider more pythonic):

def recvall(sock, buffer_size=4096):
    buf = sock.recv(buffer_size)
    while buf:
        yield buf
        if len(buf) < buffer_size: break
        buf = sock.recv(buffer_size)
# ...
with socket.create_connection((host, port)) as sock:
    sock.sendall(command)
    response = b''.join(recvall(sock))

The accepted answer is fine but it will be really slow with big files -string is an immutable class this means more objects are created every time you use the + sign, using list as a stack structure will be more efficient.

This should work better

while True: 
    chunk = s.recv(10000)
    if not chunk: 
        break
    fragments.append(chunk)

print "".join(fragments)

You can do it using Serialization

from socket import *
from json import dumps, loads

def recvall(conn):
    data = ""
    while True:
    try:
        data = conn.recv(1024)
        return json.loads(data)
    except ValueError:
        continue

def sendall(conn):
    conn.sendall(json.dumps(data))

NOTE: If you want to shara a file using code above you need to encode / decode it into base64

Most of the answers describe some sort of recvall() method. If your bottleneck when receiving data is creating the byte array in a for loop, I benchmarked three approaches of allocating the received data in the recvall() method:

Byte string method:

arr = b''
while len(arr) < msg_len:
    arr += sock.recv(max_msg_size)

List method:

fragments = []
while True: 
    chunk = sock.recv(max_msg_size)
    if not chunk: 
        break
    fragments.append(chunk)
arr = b''.join(fragments)

Pre-allocated bytearray method:

arr = bytearray(msg_len)
pos = 0
while pos < msg_len:
    arr[pos:pos+max_msg_size] = sock.recv(max_msg_size)
    pos += max_msg_size

Results:

For anyone else who’s looking for an answer in cases where you don’t know the length of the packet prior.
Here’s a simple solution that reads 4096 bytes at a time and stops when less than 4096 bytes were received. However, it will not work in cases where the total length of the packet received is exactly 4096 bytes – then it will call recv() again and hang.

def recvall(sock):
    data = b''
    bufsize = 4096
    while True:
        packet = sock.recv(bufsize)
        data += packet
        if len(packet) < bufsize:
            break
    return data

I think this question has been pretty well answered, but I just wanted to add a method using Python 3.8 and the new assignment expression (walrus operator) since it is stylistically simple.

import socket

host = "127.0.0.1"
port = 31337
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
s.bind((host,port))
s.listen()
con, addr = s.accept()
msg_list = []

while (walrus_msg := con.recv(3)) != b'rn':
    msg_list.append(walrus_msg)

print(msg_list)

In this case, 3 bytes are received from the socket and immediately assigned to walrus_msg. Once the socket receives a b'rn' it breaks the loop. walrus_msg are added to a msg_list and printed after the loop breaks. This script is basic but was tested and works with a telnet session.

NOTE: The parenthesis around the (walrus_msg := con.recv(3)) are needed. Without this, while walrus_msg := con.recv(3) != b'rn': evaluates walrus_msg to True instead of the actual data on the socket.

Disclaimer: There are very rare cases in which you really need to do this. If possible use an existing application layer protocol or define your own eg. precede each message with a fixed length integer indicating the length of data that follows or terminate each message with a ‘n’ character. (Adam Rosenfield’s answer does a really good job at explaining that)

With that said, there is a way to read all of the data available on a socket. However, it is a bad idea to rely on this kind of communication as it introduces the risk of loosing data. Use this solution with extreme caution and only after reading the explanation below.

def recvall(sock):
    BUFF_SIZE = 4096
    data = bytearray()
    while True:
        packet = sock.recv(BUFF_SIZE)
        if not packet:  # Important!!
            break
        data.extend(packet)
    return data

Now the if not packet: line is absolutely critical!
Many answers here suggested using a condition like if len(packet) < BUFF_SIZE: which is broken and will most likely cause you to close your connection prematurely and loose data. It wrongly assumes that one send on one end of a TCP socket corresponds to one receive of sent number of bytes on the other end. It does not. There is a very good chance that sock.recv(BUFF_SIZE) will return a chunk smaller than BUFF_SIZE even if there’s still data waiting to be received. There is a good explanation of the issue here and here.

By using the above solution you are still risking data loss if the other end of the connection is writing data slower than you are reading. You may just simply consume all data on your end and exit when more is on the way. There are ways around it that require the use of concurrent programming, but that’s another topic of its own.

This code reads 1024*32(=32768) bytes in 32 iterations from the buffer which is received from Server in socket programming-python:

jsonString = bytearray()

for _ in range(32):

    packet = clisocket.recv(1024)
    if not packet:
       break
    jsonString.extend(packet)

Data resides in jsonString variable

Plain and simple:

data = b''
while True:
    data_chunk = client_socket.recv(1024)
    if data_chunk:
         data+=data_chunk
    else:
         break