Constructing 3D Pandas DataFrame

Question:

I’m having difficulty constructing a 3D DataFrame in Pandas. I want something like this

A               B               C
start    end    start    end    start    end ...
7        20     42       52     90       101
11       21                     213      34
56       74                     9        45
45       12

Where A, B, etc are the top-level descriptors and start and end are subdescriptors. The numbers that follow are in pairs and there aren’t the same number of pairs for A, B etc. Observe that A has four such pairs, B has only 1, and C has 3.

I’m not sure how to proceed in constructing this DataFrame. Modifying this example didn’t give me the designed output:

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

A = np.array(['one', 'one', 'two', 'two', 'three', 'three'])
B = np.array(['start', 'end']*3)
C = [np.random.randint(10, 99, 6)]*6
df = pd.DataFrame(zip(A, B, C), columns=['A', 'B', 'C'])
df.set_index(['A', 'B'], inplace=True)
df

yielded:

                C
 A          B   
 one        start   [22, 19, 16, 20, 63, 54]
              end   [22, 19, 16, 20, 63, 54]
 two        start   [22, 19, 16, 20, 63, 54]
              end   [22, 19, 16, 20, 63, 54]
 three      start   [22, 19, 16, 20, 63, 54]
              end   [22, 19, 16, 20, 63, 54]

Is there any way of breaking up the lists in C into their own columns?

EDIT: The structure of my C is important. It looks like the following:

 C = [[7,11,56,45], [20,21,74,12], [42], [52], [90,213,9], [101, 34, 45]]

And the desired output is the one at the top. It represents the starting and ending points of subsequences within a certain sequence (A, B. C are the different sequences). Depending on the sequence itself, there are a differing number of subsequences that satisfy a given condition I’m looking for. As a result, there are a differing number of start:end pairs for A, B, etc

Asked By: tlnagy

||

Answers:

First, I think you need to fill C to represent missing values

In [341]: max_len = max(len(sublist) for sublist in C)
In [344]: for sublist in C:
     ...:     sublist.extend([np.nan] * (max_len - len(sublist)))

In [345]: C
Out[345]: 
[[7, 11, 56, 45],
 [20, 21, 74, 12],
 [42, nan, nan, nan],
 [52, nan, nan, nan],
 [90, 213, 9, nan],
 [101, 34, 45, nan]]

Then, convert to a numpy array, transpose, and pass to the DataFrame constructor along with the columns.

In [288]: C = np.array(C)
In [289]: df = pd.DataFrame(data=C.T, columns=pd.MultiIndex.from_tuples(zip(A,B)))

In [349]: df
Out[349]: 
     one         two       three     
   start  end  start  end  start  end
0      7   20     42   52     90  101
1     11   21    NaN  NaN    213   34
2     56   74    NaN  NaN      9   45
3     45   12    NaN  NaN    NaN  NaN
Answered By: chrisb

Can’t you just use a panel?

import numpy as np
import pandas as pd

A = ['one', 'two' ,'three']
B = ['start','end']
C = [np.random.randint(10, 99, 2)]*6
df = pd.DataFrame(C,columns=B  )
p={}
for a in A:
    p[a]=df
panel= pd.Panel(p)
print panel['one']
Answered By: user3684792

As @Aaron mentioned in a comment above, panels have been deprecated. Also, @tlnagy mentioned his dataset would be likely to expand to more than 3 dimensions in the future.

This sounds like a good use-case for the xarray package, which provides semantically labelled arrays of arbitrarily many dimensions. Pandas and xarray have strong conversion support, and panels have been deprecated in favour of using xarray.

Initial setup of the problem.

import numpy as np

A = np.array([[7,11,56,45], [20,21,74,12]]).T
B = np.array([[42], [52]]).T
C = np.array([[90,213,9], [101, 34, 45]]).T

You can then create a three dimensional xarray.DataArray object like so:

import xarray

output_as_dataarray = xarray.concat(
    [
        xarray.DataArray(
            X,
            dims=["record", "edge"],
            coords={"record": range(X.shape[0]), "edge": ["start", "end"]},
        )
        for X in (A, B, C)
    ],
    dim="descriptor",
).assign_coords(descriptor=["A", "B", "C"])

We turn our three 2D numpy arrays into xarray.DataArray objects, and then concatenate them together along a new dimension.

Our output looks like so:

<xarray.DataArray (descriptor: 3, record: 4, edge: 2)>
array([[[  7.,  20.],
        [ 11.,  21.],
        [ 56.,  74.],
        [ 45.,  12.]],

       [[ 42.,  52.],
        [ nan,  nan],
        [ nan,  nan],
        [ nan,  nan]],

       [[ 90., 101.],
        [213.,  34.],
        [  9.,  45.],
        [ nan,  nan]]])
Coordinates:
  * record      (record) int64 0 1 2 3
  * edge        (edge) <U5 'start' 'end'
  * descriptor  (descriptor) <U1 'A' 'B' 'C'
Answered By: scottclowe
Categories: questions Tags: ,
Answers are sorted by their score. The answer accepted by the question owner as the best is marked with
at the top-right corner.