pandas groupby without turning grouped by column into index

Question:

The default behavior of pandas groupby is to turn the group by columns into index and remove them from the list of columns of the dataframe. For instance, say I have a dataFrame with these columns

col1|col2|col3|col4

if I apply a groupby say with columns col2 and col3 this way

df.groupby(['col2','col3']).sum()

The dataframe df no longer has the ['col2','col3'] in the list of columns. They are automatically turned into the indices of the resulting dataframe.

My question is how can I perform groupby on a column and yet keep that column in the dataframe?

Answers:

df.groupby(['col2','col3'], as_index=False).sum()
Answered By: user2034412

Another way to do this would be:

df.groupby(['col2', 'col3']).sum().reset_index()
Answered By: Boudewijn Aasman

Not sure, but I think the right answer would be

df.groupby(['col2','col3']).sum()
df = df.reset_index()

At least is what I do all the time to avoid dataframes with multi-index.

Answered By: set92

The following, somewhat detailed answer, is added to help those who are still confused on which variant of the answers to use.

First, the suggested two solutions to this problem are:

  • Solution 1: df.groupby(['A', 'B'], as_index=False).sum()
  • Solution 2: df.groupby(['A', 'B']).sum().reset_index()

Both give the expected result.


Solution 1:

As explained in the documentation, as_index will ask for SQL style grouped output, which will effectively ask pandas to preserve these grouped by columns in the output as it is prepared.

as_index: bool, default True

For aggregated output, return object with group labels as the index.
Only relevant for DataFrame input. as_index=False is effectively
“SQL-style” grouped output.

Example:

Given the following Dataframe:

     A     B      C      D
0    A     1  0.502130  0.959404
1    A     3  0.335416  0.087215
2    B     2  0.067308  0.084595
3    B     4  0.454158  0.723124
4    B     4  0.323326  0.895858
5    C     2  0.672375  0.356736
6    C     5  0.929655  0.371913
7    D     5  0.212634  0.540736
8    D     5  0.471418  0.268270
9    E     1  0.061270  0.739610

Applying the first solution gives:

>>> df.groupby(["A", "B"], as_index=False).sum()

     A     B      C        D
0    A     1  0.502130  0.959404
1    A     3  0.335416  0.087215
2    B     2  0.067308  0.084595
3    B     4  0.777483  1.618982
4    C     2  0.672375  0.356736
5    C     5  0.929655  0.371913
6    D     5  0.684052  0.809006
7    E     1  0.061270  0.739610

Where the groupby columns are preserved correctly.


Solution 2:

To understand the second solution, let’s look at the output of the previous command with as_index = True which is the default behavior of pandas.DataFrame.groupby (check documentation):

>>> df.groupby(["A", "B"], as_index=True).sum()
               C       D
A    B                    
A    1     0.502130  0.959404
     3     0.335416  0.087215
B    2     0.067308  0.084595
     4     0.777483  1.618982
C    2     0.672375  0.356736
     5     0.929655  0.371913
D    5     0.684052  0.809006
E    1     0.061270  0.739610

As you can see, the groupby keys become the index of the dataframe. Using, pandas.DataFrame.reset_index (check documentation) we can put back the indices of the dataframe as columns and use a default index. Which also leads us to the same results as in the previous step:

>>> df.groupby(['A', 'B']).sum().reset_index()
     A     B      C        D
0    A     1  0.502130  0.959404
1    A     3  0.335416  0.087215
2    B     2  0.067308  0.084595
3    B     4  0.777483  1.618982
4    C     2  0.672375  0.356736
5    C     5  0.929655  0.371913
6    D     5  0.684052  0.809006
7    E     1  0.061270  0.739610

Benchmark

Notice that since the first solution achieves the requirement in 1 step versus 2 steps in the second solution, the former is slightly faster:

%timeit df.groupby(["A", "B"], as_index=False).sum()
3.38 ms ± 21.2 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)

%timeit df.groupby(["A", "B"]).sum().reset_index()
3.9 ms ± 365 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
Answered By: Mohamed Ali JAMAOUI
Categories: questions Tags: , ,
Answers are sorted by their score. The answer accepted by the question owner as the best is marked with
at the top-right corner.