Wrap long lines in Python

I’d probably split the long statement up into multiple shorter statements so that the program logic is separated from the definition of the long string:

>>> def fun():
...     format_string = '{0} Here is a really long ' 
...                     'sentence with {1}'
...     print format_string.format(3, 5)

If the string is only just too long and you choose a short variable name then by doing this you might even avoid having to split the string:

>>> def fun():
...     s = '{0} Here is a really long sentence with {1}'
...     print s.format(3, 5)

You can use the fact that Python concatenates string literals which appear adjacent to each other:

>>> def fun():
...     print '{0} Here is a really long ' 
...           'sentence with {1}'.format(3, 5)

You could use the following code where indentation doesn’t matter:

>>> def fun():
        return ('{0} Here is a really long'
        ' sentence with {1}').format(3, 5)

You just need to enclose string in the parentheses.

Using concatenation of adjacent string literals, together with formatted string literals is the way to go:

x = 2
sep = 2 * 'n'
print(
    'This message is so long that it requires '
    f'more than {x} lines.{sep}'
    'And more lines may be needed.')

This approach complies with PEP 8 and allows better use of space.

No + operators needed, no backslashes for line continuation, no irregularities of indentation, no error-prone += to an accumulator string variable (which can be mistyped as =, resulting in a silent error), no stray parenthesis hanging below the print (the arguments are placed in their own level of indentation, and the next element at the indentation level of print is the next statement).

Starting the strings on the line below the line that contains the print( reduces indentation, and is more readable. Readability stems from both print( standing out, by being on its own line, and by the uniform alignment of consecutive statements of this form.

The reduction in indentation from this approach becomes more evident when raising exceptions:

raise ModuleNotFoundError(
    'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'
    'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'
    f'aaaaa {x} aaaaa')

Regarding formatted string literals (signified by the prefix "f", as in f'...'), raw strings can be formatted string literals, by combining the prefixes "r" and "f":

rf'This is a formatted raw string, {sep}here is a backslash .'

Note that raw strings are necessary for including literal backslashes without writing \. Otherwise, in a future CPython version, a SyntaxError will be raised. As of Python 3.9, a DeprecationWarning is raised:

python -X dev -c '"q"'

outputs:

<string>:1: DeprecationWarning: invalid escape sequence q

The replacements are very readable. In particular, this approach makes writing code that generates code or mathematical formulas a very pleasant task.

Rarely, the method str.format may be suitable, due to what substitutions are needed. It can be used as follows:

print((
    'This message is so long that it requires '
    'more than {x} lines.{sep}'
    'And more lines may be needed.'
    ).format(x=x, sep=sep))

I’m surprised no one mentioned the implicit style above. My preference is to use parens to wrap the string while lining the string lines up visually. Personally I think this looks cleaner and more compact than starting the beginning of the string on a tabbed new line.

Note that these parens are not part of a method call — they’re only implicit string literal concatenation.

Python 2:

def fun():
    print ('{0} Here is a really '
           'long sentence with {1}').format(3, 5)

Python 3 (with parens for print function):

def fun():
    print(('{0} Here is a really '
           'long sentence with {1}').format(3, 5))

Personally I think it’s cleanest to separate concatenating the long string literal from printing it:

def fun():
    s = ('{0} Here is a really '
         'long sentence with {1}').format(3, 5)
    print(s)