why do we invoke print after importing print_function (in Python 2.6)
Question:
To get the 3.0 print function we do the following in Python 2.6:
from __future__ import print_function
But to use the function we invoke print() not print_function(). Is this just an inconsistency or is there a good reason for this?
Why not the following:
from __future__ import print
Answers:
In Python 3, the keyword print has been changed from calling a statement to calling a function.
So instead of saying print value you now need to say print(value), or you’ll get a SyntaxError.
By doing the import, this change is effected in Python 2, too, so you can write programs using the same syntax as Python 3 (at least as far as print is concerned).
The reason is that when you import from __future__ you’re really just setting a flag that tells the interpreter to behave a bit differently than usual — in the case of print_function, the print() function is made available in place of the statement. The __future__ module is thus “special” or “magic” — it doesn’t work like the usual modules.
print_function is a FeatureName not be confused with the print built-in function itself.
It is a feature that is available from the future so that you can use the built-in function that it can provide.
Other Features include:
all_feature_names = [
"nested_scopes",
"generators",
"division",
"absolute_import",
"with_statement",
"print_function",
"unicode_literals",
]
There are specific reasons as when you migrate your code to next higher version, your program will remain as such as use the updated feature instead of the __future__ version. Also if it were function name or the keyword itself, it may cause confusion to the parser.
Simple. print is keyword in Python 2.
So a statement like
from somewhere import print
would be an automatic SyntaxError in Python 2.
Allowing (hardcoding it in the syntax)
from __future__ import print
was deemed not worth the effort.
Minimal example
>>> print # Statement.
>>> from __future__ import print_function
>>> print # Function object.
<built-in function print>
>>> print() # Function call.
>>>
As mentioned at: What is __future__ in Python used for and how/when to use it, and how it works from __future__ are magic statements that alter how Python parses code.
from __future__ import print_function in particular changes print from a statement into a built-in function, as shown in the interactive shell above.
Why print(1) works without from __future__ import print_function in Python 2
Because the:
print(1)
is parsed as:
print (1)
^^^^^ ^^^
1 2
print statement- argument
instead of:
print( 1 )
^^^^^^ ^ ^
1 2 1
print() function- argument
And:
assert 1 == (1)
as mentioned at: Python tuple trailing comma syntax rule
For completness, all the currently available features are:
+------------------+-------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------+
| feature | optional in | mandatory in | effect |
+------------------+-------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------+
| nested_scopes | 2.1.0b1 | 2.2 | PEP 227: Statically Nested Scopes |
| generators | 2.2.0a1 | 2.3 | PEP 255: Simple Generators |
| division | 2.2.0a2 | 3.0 | PEP 238: Changing the Division Operator |
| absolute_import | 2.5.0a1 | 3.0 | PEP 328: Imports: Multi-Line and Absolute/Relative |
| with_statement | 2.5.0a1 | 2.6 | PEP 343: The “with” Statement |
| print_function | 2.6.0a2 | 3.0 | PEP 3105: Make print a function |
| unicode_literals | 2.6.0a2 | 3.0 | PEP 3112: Bytes literals in Python 3000 |
| generator_stop | 3.5.0b1 | 3.7 | PEP 479: StopIteration handling inside generators |
| annotations | 3.7.0b1 | 4.0 | PEP 563: Postponed evaluation of annotations |
+------------------+-------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------+
To get the 3.0 print function we do the following in Python 2.6:
from __future__ import print_function
But to use the function we invoke print() not print_function(). Is this just an inconsistency or is there a good reason for this?
Why not the following:
from __future__ import print
In Python 3, the keyword print has been changed from calling a statement to calling a function.
So instead of saying print value you now need to say print(value), or you’ll get a SyntaxError.
By doing the import, this change is effected in Python 2, too, so you can write programs using the same syntax as Python 3 (at least as far as print is concerned).
The reason is that when you import from __future__ you’re really just setting a flag that tells the interpreter to behave a bit differently than usual — in the case of print_function, the print() function is made available in place of the statement. The __future__ module is thus “special” or “magic” — it doesn’t work like the usual modules.
print_function is a FeatureName not be confused with the print built-in function itself.
It is a feature that is available from the future so that you can use the built-in function that it can provide.
Other Features include:
all_feature_names = [
"nested_scopes",
"generators",
"division",
"absolute_import",
"with_statement",
"print_function",
"unicode_literals",
]
There are specific reasons as when you migrate your code to next higher version, your program will remain as such as use the updated feature instead of the __future__ version. Also if it were function name or the keyword itself, it may cause confusion to the parser.
Simple. print is keyword in Python 2.
So a statement like
from somewhere import print
would be an automatic SyntaxError in Python 2.
Allowing (hardcoding it in the syntax)
from __future__ import print
was deemed not worth the effort.
Minimal example
>>> print # Statement.
>>> from __future__ import print_function
>>> print # Function object.
<built-in function print>
>>> print() # Function call.
>>>
As mentioned at: What is __future__ in Python used for and how/when to use it, and how it works from __future__ are magic statements that alter how Python parses code.
from __future__ import print_function in particular changes print from a statement into a built-in function, as shown in the interactive shell above.
Why print(1) works without from __future__ import print_function in Python 2
Because the:
print(1)
is parsed as:
print (1)
^^^^^ ^^^
1 2
printstatement- argument
instead of:
print( 1 )
^^^^^^ ^ ^
1 2 1
print()function- argument
And:
assert 1 == (1)
as mentioned at: Python tuple trailing comma syntax rule
For completness, all the currently available features are:
+------------------+-------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------+
| feature | optional in | mandatory in | effect |
+------------------+-------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------+
| nested_scopes | 2.1.0b1 | 2.2 | PEP 227: Statically Nested Scopes |
| generators | 2.2.0a1 | 2.3 | PEP 255: Simple Generators |
| division | 2.2.0a2 | 3.0 | PEP 238: Changing the Division Operator |
| absolute_import | 2.5.0a1 | 3.0 | PEP 328: Imports: Multi-Line and Absolute/Relative |
| with_statement | 2.5.0a1 | 2.6 | PEP 343: The “with” Statement |
| print_function | 2.6.0a2 | 3.0 | PEP 3105: Make print a function |
| unicode_literals | 2.6.0a2 | 3.0 | PEP 3112: Bytes literals in Python 3000 |
| generator_stop | 3.5.0b1 | 3.7 | PEP 479: StopIteration handling inside generators |
| annotations | 3.7.0b1 | 4.0 | PEP 563: Postponed evaluation of annotations |
+------------------+-------------+--------------+----------------------------------------------------+