How can you set class attributes from variable arguments (kwargs) in python

You can use the setattr() method:

class Foo:
  def setAllWithKwArgs(self, **kwargs):
    for key, value in kwargs.items():
      setattr(self, key, value)

There is an analogous getattr() method for retrieving attributes.

Their might be a better solution but what comes to mind for me is:

class Test:
    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        self.args=dict(**kwargs)

    def getkwargs(self):
        print(self.args)

t=Test(a=1, b=2, c="cats")
t.getkwargs()


python Test.py 
{'a': 1, 'c': 'cats', 'b': 2}

I suspect it might be better in most instances to use named args (for better self documenting code) so it might look something like this:

class Foo:
    def setAll(a=None, b=None, c=None):
        for key, value in (a, b, c):
            if (value != None):
                settattr(self, key, value)

class SymbolDict(object):
  def __init__(self, **kwargs):
    for key in kwargs:
      setattr(self, key, kwargs[key])

x = SymbolDict(foo=1, bar='3')
assert x.foo == 1

I called the class SymbolDict because it essentially is a dictionary that operates using symbols instead of strings. In other words, you do x.foo instead of x['foo'] but under the covers it’s really the same thing going on.

I propose a variation of fqxp’s answer, which, in addition to allowed attributes, lets you set default values for attributes:

class Foo():
    def __init__(self, **kwargs):
        # define default attributes
        default_attr = dict(a=0, b=None, c=True)
        # define (additional) allowed attributes with no default value
        more_allowed_attr = ['d','e','f']
        allowed_attr = list(default_attr.keys()) + more_allowed_attr
        default_attr.update(kwargs)
        self.__dict__.update((k,v) for k,v in default_attr.items() if k in allowed_attr)

This is Python 3.x code, for Python 2.x you need at least one adjustment, iteritems() in place of items().

VERY LATE FOLLOW UP

I recently rewrote the above code as a class decorator, so that hard coding of attributes is reduced to a minimum. In some way it resembles some features of the @dataclass decorator, which is what you might want to use instead.

# class decorator definition
def classattributes(default_attr,more_allowed_attr):
    def class_decorator(cls):
        def new_init(self,*args,**kwargs):
            allowed_attr = list(default_attr.keys()) + more_allowed_attr
            default_attr.update(kwargs)
            self.__dict__.update((k,v) for k,v in default_attr.items() if k in allowed_attr)
        cls.__init__ = new_init
        return cls
    return class_decorator

# usage:
# 1st arg is a dict of attributes with default values
# 2nd arg is a list of additional allowed attributes which may be instantiated or not
@classattributes( dict(a=0, b=None, c=True) , ['d','e','f'] )
class Foo():
    pass # add here class body except __init__

@classattributes( dict(g=0, h=None, j=True) , ['k','m','n'] )
class Bar():
    pass # add here class body except __init__

obj1 = Foo(d=999,c=False)
obj2 = Bar(h=-999,k="Hello")

obj1.__dict__ # {'a': 0, 'b': None, 'c': False, 'd': 999}
obj2.__dict__ # {'g': 0, 'h': -999, 'j': True, 'k': 'Hello'}

this one is the easiest via larsks

class Foo:
    def setAllWithKwArgs(self, **kwargs):
        for key, value in kwargs.items():
            setattr(self, key, value)

my example:

class Foo:
    def __init__(self, **kwargs):
        for key, value in kwargs.items():
            setattr(self, key, value)

door = Foo(size='180x70', color='red chestnut', material='oak')
print(door.size) #180x70

Most answers here do not cover a good way to initialize all allowed attributes to just one default value.
So, to add to the answers given by @fqxp and @mmj:

class Myclass:

    def __init__(self, **kwargs):
        # all those keys will be initialized as class attributes
        allowed_keys = set(['attr1','attr2','attr3'])
        # initialize all allowed keys to false
        self.__dict__.update((key, False) for key in allowed_keys)
        # and update the given keys by their given values
        self.__dict__.update((key, value) for key, value in kwargs.items() if key in allowed_keys)

The following solutions vars(self).update(kwargs) or self.__dict__.update(**kwargs) are not robust, because the user can enter any dictionary with no error messages. If I need to check that the user insert the following signature (‘a1’, ‘a2’, ‘a3’, ‘a4’, ‘a5’) the solution does not work. Moreover, the user should be able to use the object by passing the “positional parameters” or the “kay-value pairs parameters”.

So I suggest the following solution by using a metaclass.

from inspect import Parameter, Signature

class StructMeta(type):
    def __new__(cls, name, bases, dict):
        clsobj = super().__new__(cls, name, bases, dict)
        sig = cls.make_signature(clsobj._fields)
        setattr(clsobj, '__signature__', sig)
        return clsobj

def make_signature(names):
    return Signature(
        Parameter(v, Parameter.POSITIONAL_OR_KEYWORD) for v in names
    )

class Structure(metaclass = StructMeta):
    _fields = []
    def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
        bond = self.__signature__.bind(*args, **kwargs)
        for name, val in bond.arguments.items():
            setattr(self, name, val)

if __name__ == 'main':

   class A(Structure):
      _fields = ['a1', 'a2']

   if __name__ == '__main__':
      a = A(a1 = 1, a2 = 2)
      print(vars(a))

      a = A(**{a1: 1, a2: 2})
      print(vars(a))

Yet another variant based on the excellent answers by mmj and fqxp. What if we want to

1. Avoid hardcoding a list of allowed attributes
2. Directly and explicitly set default values for each attributes in the constructor
3. Restrict kwargs to predefined attributes by either
   • silently rejecting invalid arguments or, alternatively,
   • raising an error.

By “directly”, I mean avoiding an extraneous default_attributes dictionary.

class Bar(object):
    def __init__(self, **kwargs):

        # Predefine attributes with default values
        self.a = 0
        self.b = 0
        self.A = True
        self.B = True

        # get a list of all predefined values directly from __dict__
        allowed_keys = list(self.__dict__.keys())

        # Update __dict__ but only for keys that have been predefined 
        # (silently ignore others)
        self.__dict__.update((key, value) for key, value in kwargs.items() 
                             if key in allowed_keys)

        # To NOT silently ignore rejected keys
        rejected_keys = set(kwargs.keys()) - set(allowed_keys)
        if rejected_keys:
            raise ValueError("Invalid arguments in constructor:{}".format(rejected_keys))

Not a major breakthrough, but maybe useful to someone…

EDIT:
If our class uses @property decorators to encapsulate “protected” attributes with getters and setters, and if we want to be able to set these properties with our constructor, we may want to expand the allowed_keys list with values from dir(self), as follows:

allowed_keys = [i for i in dir(self) if "__" not in i and any([j.endswith(i) for j in self.__dict__.keys()])]

The above code excludes

• any hidden variable from dir() (exclusion based on presence of “__”), and
• any method from dir() whose name is not found in the end of an attribute name (protected or otherwise) from __dict__.keys(), thereby likely keeping only @property decorated methods.

This edit is likely only valid for Python 3 and above.

Both the setattr() and __dict__.update() methods bypass property @setter functions. The only way I have found to get this to work is by using exec().

exec is considered a security risk, but we’re not using it with any old user input, so I can’t see why it would be. If you disagree I’d really like to learn why, so please leave a comment. I don’t want to be advocating or committing insecure code.

My example is mostly borrowed from previous answers for completeness, but the main difference is the line exec(f"self.{key} = '{value}'")

class Foo:
    def __init__(self, **kwargs):
        # Predefine attributes with default values
        self.a = 0
        self.b = 0
        self.name = " "
        

        # get a list of all predefined attributes
        allowed_keys = [attr for attr in dir(self) if not attr.startswith("_")]
        for key, value in kwargs.items():
            # Update properties, but only for keys that have been predefined 
            # (silently ignore others)
            if key in allowed_keys:
                exec(f"self.{key} = '{value}'")

    @property
    def name(self):
        return f"{self.firstname} {self.lastname}"
    
    @name.setter
    def name(self, name):
        self.firstname, self.lastname = name.split(" ", 2)

I landed on this page with a subtly different question, but here’s the answer I needed:

Try namedtuple class (see this answer), or the @dataclass decorator (this question).

These are built specifically with this kind of functionality in mind, but may be less flexible than the other answers here.

This is what I usually do:

class Foo():
    def __init__(self, **kwrgs):
        allowed_args = ('a', 'b', 'c')
        default_values = {'a':None, 'b':None} 
        self.__dict__.update(default_values)
        if set(kwrgs.keys()).issubset(allowed_args):
            self.__dict__.update(kwrgs)
        else:
            unallowed_args = set(kwrgs.keys()).difference(allowed_args)
            raise Exception (f'The following unsupported argument(s) is passed to Foo:n{unallowed_args}')

For most cases I find this short code enough.

Note

Using setattr with for loop can negatively impact the performance of your code especially if you create a lot of this class. In my test, replacing the __update__ with setattr(self, key, value) in a for loop for the Foo class above, made the class take 1.4 times longer to instantiate. This will be worst if you have more arguments to set. The for loops are slow in python so this is not a surprise.